- Prof. Graham
- Dr. Havas
- Dr. Hughes
- Dr. Rae
- Dr. Adiel Tel Oren (founder)
About · Contact us · Terms of use · Dr. T
Dirty Electricity
Poor power quality, also known as dirty electricity, has been a concern for the electric utility for decades. Dirty electricity refers to electromagnetic energy that flows along a conductor and deviates from a pure 60-Hz sine wave (Figure 1). It has both harmonic and non harmonic (transient) components and emerged as a problem
in the late 1970s with the increasing use of electronic devices that produce nonlinear loads. Karl Stahlkopf, a vice president of the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), estimates that dirty power costs U.S. industry between $4 and $6 billion a year, and that it is likely to get worse before it can be mitigated. EPRI expects that 70% of all electricity produced within the U.S. will flow through electronic devices by 2002, compared with 30% in 1999 (Fortune, 1999).
Dirty electricity is ubiquitous. It is generated by electronic equipment such as computers, plasma televisions, energy efficient appliances, dimmer switches, as well as arcing on electrical conductors caused by loose wires or contact with trees (Figure 2). Dirty electricity is thus produced within buildings but can also enter buildings from neighbors who share the same transformer. Mobile or broadcast antennas, if not properly filtered, can also contribute to high frequencies on electrical wires in nearby buildings.
Figure 1. Visual display of dirty electricity (kHz range) and 60 Hz power frequency without (left) and with (right) Graham/Stetzer filters. A 2-channel Fluke 199 Scopemeter was attached to a ubiquitous filter to separate the 60 Hz frequency from the dirty electricity (Graham, 2000). The improved power quality has fewer spikes and smaller amplitude for the high frequency transients. The GS filters have no effect on the 60 Hz sine wave.
Figure 2. Sources of dirty electricity include electronic equipment and appliances, arcing on wires, and unfiltered cell phone and broadcast frequencies from nearby antennas.
The IEEE 519-1992 recommends installing filters to control harmonic distortions on power lines. With 5 kV and higher voltage distribution lines the IEEE identifies voltage notching, which produces both harmonic and nonharmonic frequencies in the radio frequency (RF) range and, as such, can introduce harmful effects associated with spurious RF. Industry uses large capacitors to protect sensitive equipment from power surges, especially in production line work, where malfunctions and down time are costly. Until now filters have not been available for in home use.
Professor Martin Graham from UC Berkeley and power quality expert, Dave Stetzer, President of Stetzer Electric in Wisconsin, have designed a filter that can be used inside buildings to clean the power that enters the building as well as the dirty electricity generated within the building. The Graham/Stetzer (GS) filter is a compact unit that plugs into an electrical outlet (Figure 3). It contains an electrical capacitor that shorts-out the high frequency transients on the circuit and is most effective when placed close to the appliance generating the dirty electricity. The GS filter has optimum filtering capacity between 4 and 100 kHz (Graham, 2000, 2002).
In Russia, the safety guidelines for electric and magnetic field exposure are frequency specific. For frequencies between 5 Hz and 2 kHz, the guideline is 25 V/m for electric fields and 0.25 T (2.5 mG) for magnetic fields. For frequencies between 2 and 400 kHz, the guidelines are lower by a factor of 10. Since energy is proportional to frequency, the energy is 1,000 times higher at 60 kHz than it is at 60 Hz.
Figure 3. Equipment used to reduce and monitor dirty electricity inside buildings: the Graham/Stetzer filter and the microsurge meter.
The microsurge meter (Figure 3), also designed by Graham and Stetzer, measures the energy associated with dirty electricity in GS units with a range from 1 to 1999 and an accuracy of ±5% (Graham, 2003). The Health Department of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2003) has stated that any reading on the microsurge meter exceeding 50 is unacceptable and steps must be taken to lower such readings. Experience with this meter suggests that values below 30 GS units are undesirable and that extremely sensitive individuals may not see any benefits until the values are at or below 20 GS units. In some extremely dirty environments it is not possible to achieve such low values.
In the following, a number of case studies are presented.






